Monthly Archives: February 2006

Feuerstein: cognitive theorist

Family and personal events include an encounter with the work of an Israeli psychologist Dr. Reuven Feuerstein. Warning: Amateur at work in this summary.

One formulation of his work is a “Theory of Structural Cognitive Modifiability” – Intelligence is not like the 1930′s model (one CPU somewhere in our brain giving rise to a single measurement of IQ). Rather (in Feuerstein’s theory) four functions: planning/sequencing, attending (managing distractions), generalising (or not)/categorisation, and processing.

There’s a whole bunch of theory at www.icelp.org/asp/Feuerstein.shtm

The jargon is beyond me but . . . my question/challenge was my son. (Who was described last year as “the dumbest smarta**e ever” by a classmate, and who has had some interesting experiences with teachers over the past year) It’s been quite remarkable: several sessions with John Gourley with my son last week and the week before, and today with my son and daughter together.

Me and Mark both low on one key function. My daughter was very (very) high: aced the test, bet us both my a mile. I’m old enough to know there is never a magic bullet.

But this has REALLY HELPED.

Several insights: “Schools are set up for those strong in sequential processing” I’ll leave it to your imagination as to how a strong simultaneous processor/global thinker can get fouled up, especially when you don’t know how to express how you got the answer. . . and NCEA rewarding sequential stuff big time.

Here’s the interesting claim: “You can get involved with someone to assist the development of these functions” Feuerstein uses the term mediate (not teach) . . .

In the Feuerstein approach the teacher is replaced by a mediator, whose task is to help the learner learn. The task is not aimed at placing a specified body of knowledge into the learner’s head. . . . mediation is done by a warm human being who works with the learner in such a way that both of them discover how the learner learns and how to improve the learner’s learning process. The mediator’s intention is NOT to help the learner to solve the problem posed by the stimulus. It is rather to understand, with the learner, the process whereby the learner learns. The stimulus, in the form of a test, has been designed to make it possible for the two of them to investigate this process. The learner is involved in a three step learning process. In the first step the learner receives the stimulus which has been especially designed to make it possible for the learner and mediator to gain insights into the learning process. In the second stage the learner processes the information. In the third stage the learner decides upon a response, and is also assisted by the mediator.

Feuerstein describes this three step process as a “Mediated Learning Experience”  From: www.icelp.org/files/research/demingfeuerstein.pdf

John has been a great help, I can tell you.  He has one of the lightest internet footprints of anyone I know, but he is in the white pages.

Non-tekky brekky & Google

Had some controversy at the Web 2.0 Non-Tekky brekky recently. About Google. Google is OK vs Google is not.

Found this link today: www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_02.php#004400 Apologies. it was on one of a score of new blogs I dipped into when looking for something to help with a colour scheme, and I have no idea where I was.

By the way, this is approaching my last post on this blog. Want to move to something with some different functionality. Plog is great. But I need more.

Google or Not??

Had some controversy at the web 2.0 Non-Tekky brekky recently. About Google. Google is OK vs Google is not.

Are they beng evil?
Found this link today: www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_02.php#004400 Apologies. it was on one of a score of new blogs I dipped into when looking for something to help with a colour scheme, and I have no idea where I was.

By the way, this is aproaching my last post on this blog. Want to move to something with some different functionality. Plog is great. But I need more.

UPDATE: (3 April 2006) The issue is not privacy for me – it’s people using me to make money by tracking me (etc) and serving things up to me. Are there better search engines than Google? Should I be prepared to pay the price for havng Google?

AFTERWORD:  (8 Dec 2006) I now use gmail.  And last week I actually clicked on a link to do with Best Buys in cameras.  I suspect the system noticed I have some correspondence on the topic and served them up appropriately.

Intranets for schools

I discovered a list I wrote in 2000. Features I’d like in an intranet . . . I think I owe some of these ideas to discussions with Graham Warburton.

A picture of a fully developed intranet

Monday 3rd July 2000

  1. A medium to communicate information – all sorts of administrative stuff for staff – all sorts of curriculum stuff to kids and parents, daily notices, events for kids such as Science summer schools information etc etc.
  2. A way of quickly accessing teaching programmes and resources eg labs, worksheets, videos, pictures, applications such as datalogging, graph analysis, etc etc. One click and you are there.
  3. A way of helping kids revise – objectives, summaries, on line check tests.
  4. A ways of quickly getting remote events into the school and homes eg Kokiri (outdoor ed) experiences etc
  5. A way to save paper – assignment on the intranet. Kids can access it anytime. – even when away – takes the hassle out it the paper war for teachers too.
  6. A way of sharing students on-line presentations.
  7. A way to access stuff from home for staff and students.
  8. A way of giving students remedial work by them being able to view a video on a technique such as soldering correctly, or how to slice carrots.
  9. Breaks the “same time-same place” requirement for learning.
  10. Seamless and precise integration of web access – when it’s needed. (More than just a list of web sites, but specifically targeted pages)
  11. Enables collaborative document sharing

Coaching and “In Cold Blood”

Had a visit with Max today (INR, Enrich etc), talking about the internet and things that can be done. Mentioned coaching. Donna Andronicos has some audio coaching soon.
audio
Very interesting. The same old theme. People with goals and finding it hard to work on them systematically. A real interest of mine. And he’d got some tickets to Capote.
cold
The writer (Capote) paid a visit to a small country town to investigate some unusual killings, and ended up writing a book – and having to wait until the killers were hung. It cost him his sanity. We need to consider carefully what we invest our selves in. Why I feel just a little guilty when I watch the “Pink Panther” movies. (The originals). What the roles cost Peter Sellers.