Category Archives: unConferences

Unconferencing again: TeachMeets

More on UnConferencing: UnConferencing meets Teacher Professional Development

In the posts on MirandaNet about the axing of BECTA one of the contributors, Leon Cych posted this comment:

I’d much rather see teachers who have developed “open” expertise, sharing it with each other at a social event in a transparent way, rather than traditional models of training. If someone has found an innovative and useful way of working with software or hardware then they often develop a highly developed generic expertise and forge new pedagogies round that and often ways in which it has not been thought of by the software companies themselves. TeachMeets are rapidly becoming seed beds for grass root talents sharing and disseminating 21st Century skills.
I have seen this time and time again at TeachMeets (teachmeet.pbworks.com) and that model is finally beginning to catch on.

From the TeachMeet site:

What are the tried and tested structures from Teachmeets?

  • 7 minute short presentation (sometimes 2 or 3 lined up)
  • 2 minute nano presentation (3-5 one after the other)
  • Break out sessions (@SLF 4 speakers took up 4 different locations, participants chose to listen to who they like)
  • Random speakers – Classtools fruit machine.

And this, from teachmeet.pbworks.com/Organise

TeachMeet is an unconference, but that doesn’t mean that it doesn’t need organising. Early on, get a small group together to get everything sorted out for your event

. . . . and some structure/rules:

Some rules might be: no PowerPoints, micro-presentations must last no more than seven minutes, nano presentations no more than two, no selling of products, everything must be happening in a classroom now.

We all know the best parts of conferences are, of course, the coffee breaks and social events, where you get a chance to pore over someone’s laptop for 15 minutes and learn one new really cool thing you can actually use, have late-night discussions over serious stuff, helped along by a few drops of amber. Why not just make this the conference itself? Provide coffee and tea all day long, lots of muffins and biscuits

In other words, PD by the people for the people, what’s happening now, presented by the people doing it. A great structure for an UnConference.

A final comment from Leon:

“Training” is a bit of a cul-de-sac, or rather a one way street, in my opinion. It is a single function or pathway to doing things. Much better develop an independent mindset that can think and route around what resources are available rather than going down a proprietorial route.

A way ahead maybe?  Effectiveness, lower cost – and fun.

A great conference

This is probably one of the best conferences I have ever been to.  Has a good mix of emergent and formal.

Some emergent conference planning principles:

  1. Provide minimal paper, and no conference bag.
  2. Minimal paper=conference programme in pocket size form.
  3. Provide wireless.
  4. Have a comprehensive website with things you need to know.
  5. Don’t provide food. Just park the conference near a ton of nice places to eat.
  6. Give 90 minutes for lunch.
  7. Have 15 minute breaks between all sessions. (45 minute sessions @OpenEd)
  8. One result is that conference organisers can potter round in a relaxed fashion and talk or catch up with people.
  9. Have fresh coffee and cold drinks on tap.
  10. Have an unconference stream.

It is the first time I have BEEN at the conference with microblogging.

Twitter feed has been fun. So: you can ask a question about where to go, what’s best, what’s happening – as well as comment on what’s happening, what’s significant.  There is probably more, this is just so I don’t forget.

DEANZ, Wellington

Another not an FOC08 post.  But I did see Leigh last week (at the Beach in Dunedin) and  at the DEANZ conference in Wellington.

I’d have liked to do another full on workshop here on the bounded community & community issues, but there was not time and I was too late to see about negotiating this.

I am doing a 50 minute session: High Schools and Intranets.

I’d love it if the two schools my kids go to were to get a little bit more real online.  There is still no posting of assignments, timetables for things, sign up forms or anything.  Mark has had (like my other two sons before him) to set up his own learning ecology.  What do you do if it is 8.45am the night before an assignment is due and you want to do it – but where is the sheet, and it is not online?  What do you do if you forget the due date? etc.

There are two answers to this.

1. Support from the school. My session today will build on the talks I gave in Wellingon and Auckland in 2005.  How can a school set up an easy to manage, nurturing online presence to help with communication, interaction, teaching and learning?

Getting the platform is a doddle.  It’s the user transition to some new habits of mind that is not.  To think ahead: what needs to go onlne to make our jobs easy?  To improve outcomes?  To save time?

One nice school site: www.papanui.school.nz/ I don’t know what it is like BEHIND the scenes.

2. Do it ourself. Given nothing, MSN a friend, get them to scan the assignment sheet (since the school does not make it awailable electronically) and have it passed down the wire.

This is the really simple and basic stuff.

Using the Access Grid

The Access Grid Linkup for the Launch of the FLLinNZ toolkit has now been and gone. This was both stressful and a lot of fun. Blog Link. AKOWiki page Link.
I did not have a clue what I was getting myself in in for. I have done a score of VC linkups, but never the Access Grid. I thought I had done my homework, but NO WAY.
The AG is a room, painted green with a computer at one end for the operator, and a wall at the other end with 3 data projectors. There are three cameras. When things are going we could see 8 windows:

  1. Auckland, Wellington, 2 of us and 2 of Dunedin.
  2. The powerpoint.
  3. Leigh’s shared web browser.
  4. The Blackboard

ag-overview.jpg
I lined these up in order Auck > Well > Dunedin. The picture was too fuzzy in Auckland to see expressions. I relied on the ‘tell‘ from Dunedin’s folk to see how things were going. :-)

Things I learned.

Time is needed to set up the ‘view’ of each group. I never managed to see all the Dunedin folk even though we had two windows for them.

I had this romantic idea that in between times (like when we were watching a youtube video) we could snack and socialise a bit. Hmm. Didn’t quite come together. :-)

I was told we could have a “shared browser” and Powerpoint, so I based my entire presenation around this. However, a shared browser meant only the operator could press the buttons and use the mouse. And no shared sound. The AG version of the web was like silent movies. Apparently there is a problem to play sound: we ended up getting each of the four operators to load the podcast and play it sumultaneously.

This meant no Youtube.com or Podcasts . . .

PowerPoint kept crashing. (M$. Not unusual)

Everything is operator dependent, unless you have some software on a laptop. I thought “No problem, lets install it” but the software was not there in the room. Next time I will sort this.

Powerpoint slides could be visible to me and not them and vice versa. It could get out of sink somehow. But when it went it was fine.

Collaborative note taking is a MUST for sessions like this. There is not whiteboard (a fact I had forgotten) so we used a blackboard from the hallway.ag-blackboard.jpg

Possible solutions: use one window as a sort of wiki, maybe a whiteboard opened up to a shared browser.
There is a document camera. This would be OK as well.

We tried a scenario where each group had a few moments to interact and answer a question – this worked well.

Basically it fulfilled the need – sort of. We had some dialogue over the main issues around staff development . . . in another post I will talk about this.

ag-bruce.jpg

Launch of the FLLinNZ staff development toolkit.

Confirmed.  Ten minutes ago: 19th October 2007.  Access Grid.

Venues: Auckland | Wellington | Christchurch | Dunedin

3.00pm.  Snacks provided.  3 brief presentations, and plenty of chatter/feedback and conversation.

FAQ: What is the Access Grid? It’s a room somewhere in the uni with bandwidth to burn.  Full duplex video.
How do I register? Details coming soon.  Meanwhile, e-mail me. (derek(dot)chirnside(at)canterbury(dot)ac(dot)nz)

For more detail about NZ AG, go here.

Unconferences again.

blogoz180.jpg Just found the blogging conference in Brisbane. A sort of unconference. Here is a quote from their page of information about format.

Adapted from the BloggerCon IV Format by David Winer.

This will be an unusual conference. We generally won’t have speakers, panels or an audience.  We will have discussions and sessions, and each session will have a discussion leader.

The discussion leader
Think of the discussion leader as a reporter who is creating a story with quotes from the people in the room. So, instead of having a panel and an audience we just have contributors.  We feel this more accurately reflects what’s going on. It’s not uncommon for the audience at a conference to have more expertise collectively than the people who are speaking.

The discussion leader is also the editor, so if he or she feels that a point has been made they must move on to the next point quickly. No droning, no filibusters, no repeating an idea over and over.

The discussion leader can also call on people.

Think of it as a weblog
Think of the conference as if it were a weblog. At the beginning of each session, the leader talks between five and fifteen minutes. He or she will introduce the idea and some of the people in the room.

Then he or she will facilitate the discussion among all the contributors in the room, inviting others to comment and asking questions of others. It is hoped that everyone who would like to contribute to the discussion will be able to do so in the allotted time.

We have a limited amount of time, and a group of participants whose time is valuable. The leader’s job is to make sure the show stays interesting, even captivating. If it gets boring people will leave the
room and schmooze, or read their email, or whatever. So the leader’s job is to keep it moving. Sometimes this may mean cutting people off.

Looks really cool.