<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>light in the shadows &#187; Web 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lits.gen.nz/tag/web-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lits.gen.nz</link>
	<description>Learning mainly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:24:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fictional Blogging</title>
		<link>http://lits.gen.nz/2007/12/11/fictional-blogging/</link>
		<comments>http://lits.gen.nz/2007/12/11/fictional-blogging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek Chirnside</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cool teaching strategies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lits.gen.nz/2007/12/11/fictional-blogging/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>GE331 at Otago University runs a really cool class activity.</p> Write collaboratively in a wiki.  (In this case a script for a soap opera) Blog (in character, in german) for a month.  [This is an interesting genre]  Shoot the video and put it on YouTube.  (Complete with Bloopers) <p>See it here: http://seifenoper.wikispaces.com/   Fictional Blogging.  <p>Continue reading <a href="http://lits.gen.nz/2007/12/11/fictional-blogging/">Fictional Blogging</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GE331 at Otago University runs a really cool class activity.</p>
<ol>
<li>Write collaboratively in a wiki.  (In this case a script for a soap opera)</li>
<li>Blog (in character, in german) for a month.  [This is an interesting genre]</li>
<li> Shoot the video and put it on YouTube.  (Complete with Bloopers)</li>
</ol>
<p>See it here: <a href="https://exchange.canterbury.ac.nz/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://seifenoper.wikispaces.com/" target="_blank">http://seifenoper.wikispaces.com/</a> <font size="2"> </font><br />
Fictional Blogging.  An interesting use of blogs, a little outside of my direct experieince.  I did hear Angela Thomas in 2005:</p>
<p class="storycontent">
<blockquote><p><strong>Fictional Blogging and the Narrative Identities of Adolescent Girls</strong> &#8211; Angela Thomas -University of Sydney<br />
<strong>Abstract: </strong>This paper explores the emergence of fictional blogging such as blog novels and the diaries of fictional characters as a new form of narrative construction. A typology of blog fiction is first presented to outline the scope of this emergent genre. The paper then introduces a case study of two fictional diaries kept by adolescent girls who use the diaries as one of the means to co-construct and add depth to their crossover and alternate universe fan fiction based on the fantasy worlds of Middle Earth and Star Wars. The case study examines the range of discursive and social practices used by the girls in their collaborative narratives using a combination of narrative theory and post-structural feminist theory. The paper also explores the ways in which these practices embedded in fiction also reflect aspects of the girls’ real identities.<br />
From Blogtalk downuner: <a href="http://incsub.org/blogtalk/?page_id=109">http://incsub.org/blogtalk/?page_id=109</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lits.gen.nz/2007/12/11/fictional-blogging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wondering how to cope with Web 2.0</title>
		<link>http://lits.gen.nz/2006/04/04/wondering-how-to-cope-with-web-20/</link>
		<comments>http://lits.gen.nz/2006/04/04/wondering-how-to-cope-with-web-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 23:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek Chirnside</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lits.gen.nz/blog/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> I&#8217;ve established to my satisfaction that Web 2.0 has some meaning, not sure exactly what. I could say &#8220;400 web applications can&#8217;t be wrong&#8221;. There is still debate. But that&#8217;s OK.</p> <p>Me2Web2 is the term I&#8217;ve seen for yet another thing someone has done to copy something web 2.0someone else has done. This has <p>Continue reading <a href="http://lits.gen.nz/2006/04/04/wondering-how-to-cope-with-web-20/">Wondering how to cope with Web 2.0</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: bold"> </span>I&#8217;ve established to my satisfaction that Web 2.0 has some meaning, not sure exactly what.  I could say &#8220;400 web applications can&#8217;t be wrong&#8221;.  There is still debate.  But that&#8217;s OK.</p>
<p>Me2Web2 is the term <a href="http://www.sacredcowdung.com/archives/2006/03/all_things_web.html">I&#8217;ve seen for yet another thing someone has done to copy something web 2.0someone else has done</a>.  This has generated a LOT of apps &#8211; but there are some doozy little apps that are totally different.</p>
<h2>Here is my list of web 2.0 lists.<br />
PART ONE:</h2>
<ol>
<li><a href="http://www.sacredcowdung.com/archives/2006/03/all_things_web.html">All Things Web 2.0 THE LIST</a>.  This is actually a copy from another page by by Bob Stumpel, et al at OpenBC, but the link was dead.  I didn&#8217;t count them, but copying the list into an excel table took more than 1200 lines.  1200 web 2.0 or web 2.0 wannabe apps!!!</li>
<li>Don Hinchcliffes notes on <a href="http://web2.wsj2.com/the_best_web_20_software_of_2005.htm">the best of web 2.0 2005</a><br />
And on the same blog: <a href="http://web2.wsj2.com/more_great_web_20_software.htm">The addenda</a></li>
<li>And <a href="http://www.econsultant.com/web2/">Ask the eConsultant</a> Top 907 Web 2.0 sites.</li>
</ol>
<p>Not quite exactly what I want though.  1200 names is too much &#8211; I&#8217;ve been through blinky, vistaglance, lazybase, blummy, backpack and doodle to name just a few, and just have not had the time to follow them up properly, and have not been able to quickly find some definative comment on them on the web.  Tons of blogs with meaningless &#8220;me to&#8221; &#8220;what about xxx?&#8221; and &#8220;Looks like another version of xxx to me&#8221; type posts.  The best bets continue to come via personal contact.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;d like is a good, compact website listing web 2.0 things with aggregations of user comments on these.  Maybe an aggregation of tags sort of thing.  A web 2.0 type list of web 2.0 stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lits.gen.nz/2006/04/04/wondering-how-to-cope-with-web-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

